Rankings / Metabolic Health

SR9009 / SR9011

Metabolic Health · REV-ERB agonist / exercise mimetic

Tier D

High-risk evidence profile

wadarev-erbexercise-mimeticbanned-sport
High-risk evidence profile
2.9 / 10
Tier D
Ev 2 Bn 5 Sf 3

Bottom line

Read Off Label grades SR9009 / SR9011 as D (2.9/10) based on preclinical evidence, unclear benefit magnitude, and a unknown-high-risk safety profile.

Its high-risk evidence profile reflects a Safety score of 3/10; reported benefits and harms can differ by indication, dose, route, duration, and population.

WADA coverage: Rev-erbalpha agonists, SR9009 and SR9011.

Studied, labeled, or reported-use context: No approved human dose — Research chemical; WADA S4 prohibited; not individualized guidance.

Frontier potential — editorial judgment, not evidence

This is a separate axis from the grade above. It asks a different question: if this worked in humans, how much would it matter? It is our judgment, it is not part of the composite score, and it cannot raise a grade. A high number here is a statement about the idea, not about whether it works or whether anyone should take it.

3/10
Mechanistic story only Preclinical

What the ceiling rests on

REV-ERB agonists reported to produce "exercise-mimetic" effects in mice — increased mitochondrial content and running endurance without training — which is why the compound acquired its reputation.

Why it may not get there

A 2020 study found the headline endurance effects persisted in REV-ERB knockout mice, meaning the observed effects were substantially off-target rather than mechanism-driven. Oral bioavailability is very poor, so human exposure from oral dosing is minimal, and there is no human data at all. This is the clearest case in the database of a preclinical result whose stated mechanism did not hold up.

What would change this Resolution of the off-target findings; no human programme exists.

What the evidence says

WADA coverage: Rev-erbalpha agonists, SR9009 and SR9011. Added because these compounds are common in performance-enhancement marketplaces despite lacking approved human use.

Mechanism

REV-ERB agonists are marketed as endurance and fat-loss research chemicals based on circadian/metabolic signaling, but most claims are preclinical or gray-market extrapolation.

Studied, labeled, or reported dose & route

No approved human dose

This records doses and routes described in studies, approved labeling, clinical practice, or documented use. It is not individualized guidance and does not establish safety; context changes with indication, formulation, health history, monitoring, and other medicines.

Citations

A link means the source informed this entry; it does not mean every claim on the page comes from that source. If a citation looks wrong or you want a claim re-checked, send a correction.

Common questions

What does the evidence show about SR9009 / SR9011's effects?
Read Off Label rates the evidence for SR9009 / SR9011 as Preclinical and the benefit magnitude as unclear, producing an overall grade of D (2.9/10). WADA coverage: Rev-erbalpha agonists, SR9009 and SR9011.
What safety findings are reported for SR9009 / SR9011?
SR9009 / SR9011 has a unknown-high risk profile in the database. Unknown-High (limited human safety data, product-quality risk, metabolic/circadian uncertainty) Legal status: Research chemical; WADA S4 prohibited.
What does the low Safety score for SR9009 / SR9011 represent?
The Safety score is 3/10. It records the substantial harms described for one or more use contexts; the Benefit score, indication, dose, route, duration, population, and legal status remain separate parts of the evidence profile.
What doses or routes are reported for SR9009 / SR9011?
No approved human dose This is context from studies, approved labeling, clinical practice, or documented use; it is not individualized guidance and does not establish safety.
How does SR9009 / SR9011 work?
REV-ERB agonists are marketed as endurance and fat-loss research chemicals based on circadian/metabolic signaling, but most claims are preclinical or gray-market extrapolation.

This is an independent synthesis of published research by a non-clinician. Scores are opinions supported by citations, not prescriptions. See the full disclaimer and methodology for how this score was produced and what it does and doesn't mean.